Repository logo
Institutional Digital Repository
Shreenivas Deshpande Library, IIT (BHU), Varanasi

Reference evapotranspiration retrievals from a mesoscale model based weather variables for soil moisture deficit estimation

dc.contributor.authorSrivastava, P.K.
dc.contributor.authorHan, Dawei
dc.contributor.authorYaduvanshi, Aradhana
dc.contributor.authorPetropoulos, George P.
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Sudhir Kumar
dc.contributor.authorMall, Rajesh Kumar
dc.contributor.authorPrasad, Rajendra
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-12T05:46:17Z
dc.date.available2020-02-12T05:46:17Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-28
dc.description.abstractReference Evapotranspiration (ETo) and soil moisture deficit (SMD) are vital for understanding the hydrological processes, particularly in the context of sustainable water use efficiency in the globe. Precise estimation of ETo and SMD are required for developing appropriate forecasting systems, in hydrological modeling and also in precision agriculture. In this study, the surface temperature downscaled from Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model is used to estimate ETo using the boundary conditions that are provided by the European Center for Medium Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF). In order to understand the performance, the Hamon's method is employed to estimate the ETo using the temperature from meteorological station and WRF derived variables. After estimating the ETo, a range of linear and non-linear models is utilized to retrieve SMD. The performance statistics such as RMSE, %Bias, and Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) indicates that the exponential model (RMSE = 0.226; %Bias = -0.077; NSE = 0.616) is efficient for SMD estimation by using the Observed ETo in comparison to the other linear and non-linear models (RMSE range = 0.019-0.667; %Bias range = 2.821-6.894; NSE = 0.013-0.419) used in this study. On the other hand, in the scenario where SMD is estimated using WRF downscaled meteorological variables based ETo, the linear model is found promising (RMSE = 0.017; %Bias = 5.280; NSE = 0.448) as compared to the non-linear models (RMSE range = 0.022-0.707; %Bias range = -0.207--6.088; NSE range = 0.013-0.149). Our findings also suggest that all the models are performing better during the growing season (RMSE range = 0.024-0.025; %Bias range = -4.982--3.431; r = 0.245-0.281) than the non-growing season (RMSE range = 0.011-0.12; %Bias range = 33.073-32.701; r = 0.161-0.244) for SMD estimation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipGovernment of the United Kingdom Ministry of Human Resource Developmenten_US
dc.identifier.issn20711050
dc.identifier.urihttps://idr-sdlib.iitbhu.ac.in/handle/123456789/611
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.subjectEvapotranspirationen_US
dc.subjectNoah Land Surface modelen_US
dc.subjectSeasonalityen_US
dc.subjectSoil moisture deficiten_US
dc.subjectWRFen_US
dc.titleReference evapotranspiration retrievals from a mesoscale model based weather variables for soil moisture deficit estimationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Reference-evapotranspiration-retrievals-from-a-mesoscale-model-based-weather-variables-for-soil-moisture-deficit-estimation2017Sustainability-SwitzerlandOpen-Access.pdf
Size:
4.2 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Open Access Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: